Ethics Committee (CreepySins)
Ethics Committee | |
|---|---|
| Information | |
| Type | Civil |
| Abbreviation | EC |
| Group | Open link |
| Group Id | 4095963 |
| Leadership | |
| Overseer | Robin_Nox |
| Director of Ethics | Ero_CZ |
The Ethics Committee is a civil department within CreepySins SCPF, that has been established at the founding of the SCPF. It is represented by a member of the O5 Council, and has both on-site and off-site duties. The Ethics Committee is tasked with the enforcement of foundation law, specifically ethical violations. It is lead by the Director of Ethics, Ero_CZ. The Ethics Committee has public guidelines[1].
Structure
The Ethics Committee has a traditional structure with entry, employee, management and directorate ranks.
| Overseer | |
|---|---|
 | |
| First holder | ConerSins[2] |
| Director | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Rank | Type | Clearance | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Director of Ethics | Directorate | Level-5 | Director of the department, tasked with leadership and upper-management duties. General oversight over the committee and punishments handed out. Holds a veto power for investigations and committee processes. |
| Assistant Director of Ethics | Level-4 | Assistant Director, assisting the director with leadership and maintenance. General oversight over the committee and punishments handed out. | |
| Chief Secretary | Management | Level-3 | Leader of one of the subcommittees, tasked with the management and leadership of them. They are the chief of their segment and the corresponding duties to it. |
| Secretary | Assistant leader of one of the subcommittees, tasked with general day-to-day management of committee procedures and maintenance of smooth functioning. | ||
| Senior Constituent | Employee | Level-2 | Senior employee of the committee, and part of the general workforce. Senior Constituents are part of one subcommittee and are given more privileges and have a higher reputation. Senior Constituents also take part in training Students. |
| Ethical Constituent | Ethical Constituents resemble the general workforce of the Ethics Committee, being part in a subcommitte. This is the standard rank within the committee. | ||
| Ethical Staff | Ethical Staff resemble the general workforce of the Ethics Committee, though they are not part of a segment and only have on-site duties. Most members of the committee only stay in this rank for a limited amount of time as they wait for their admission in a subcommittee. | ||
| Student | Entry | Level-1 | Students are new employees within the Ethics Committee, awaiting their training and full admission to become a fully-fledged member of the Ethics Committee. |
Subcommittees
The Ethics Committee has two subcommittees (officially called "Segments"), the judicial and investigative subcommittee. Employees wanting to advance beyond the "Ethical Staff" rank are required to be part of a subcommittee. Directorate members and the Overseer are not part of a subcommittee.
The investigative segment sits at the forefront of the committee, admitting cases, processing them, and initiating investigations[3]. Members of the investigative segment are authorised to host interrogations and questionings, and are the first ones to touch a report during processing.
The judicial segment processes the report at last, reviewing evidence and deciding for a verdict and punishment. The judicial segment is the only judiciary body within the foundation[4], though not the only appelate body. In the past, the judicial segment has held appellate hearings alongside the O5 Council for punishments given through the Ethics Committee. This sparked controversy, as the members of the board were part of the segment that has convicted the defendant in the first place. This practice was later abolished, with the O5 Council remaining the only appelate body.
The appellate board is a segment/subdivision was in works for some time, but was ultimately dismissed in favour of the Board of Directors hearing the appeals.
Subdivisions
The Ethics Committee hosts one subdivision, though it is unclear whether it is active or inactive[5]. The purpose of it is unclear.
History
The Ethics Committee has been established with the founding of the foundation, as it is a vital department. The department has received their overseer during the first O5 generation, beginning with ConerSins[6]. In the past, the Committee named their Director "The Editor", and the Assistant Director "Vice Editor". The Ethics Committee featured the Board of Ethics, though not much knowledge about its purpose remains. It was supposed to be quite powerful.
After a remake somewhere between 2018 and 2021, the Ethics Committee featured a ranking system similar to that of a government. Here, the ranks "Ethical Staff", "Ethical Constituent" and "Senior Constituent" were born. Though, the directorate ranks were "President" for the director, and "Governor" for the Assistant Director. These ranks were changed to the current form at an unknown time.
The committee underwent multiple changes in leadership. Changes of councillor and director were not documented.
Controversies
The Ethics Committee is often in the public's gossip due to the nature of their tasks, with controversial sentencing occuring quite often.
Ethical Inquiry #2
Ethical Inquiry #2 is an ethical inquiry of the Ethics Committee about the necessity and purpose of the two combative enforcement divisions, the Internal Monitoring & Enforcement Agency ("IME") and Iota-10[7]. After completion, the inquiry was published. The inquiry featured opinions of committee members, most of which were not too friendly of these enforcement divisions. As a result, multiple members of the Mobile Task Forces have voiced disagreement with this inquiry.